Guest post by: Brison Harvey, social studies teacher at Lafayette High School in Lexington & one of the Common Assignment Study teachers
Innovation inspires change. Thinking of a new way to wash
the car or grocery shop can shoot an ambitious business person to the top,
reaping the rewards of the invention along the way. It provides an exciting,
autonomous and rewarding journey to solving a problem or making the existing
world slightly more efficient and enjoyable. Creating an environment of
innovation climbs to the top of many corporate goals; perhaps it is time for
education to take the same step.
In order to innovate, a teacher needs some boundaries,
resources and safety nets. Standards create an adequate starting point for the
boundaries that a teacher should not cross. The standards help to create some level
of uniformity within the classrooms across schools, districts and states.
Likewise, some level of accountability for student growth and achievement
creates a certain amount of containment to the innovation. However, that
containment is necessary to ensure that students do not lose out in the course
of experimenting within the classroom. It may keep the "mad
scientist" from creating a monster hole in the natural growth of the
students in their classroom.
Inventors in any field need some type of resources in order
to create their new invention. "Edventors" also need the supplies to
create a new product that will help students learn. The simplest resource to
provide teachers with is time. Creating additional time to think, invent, test
and revise will help create a more polished and effective result. The largest
deficiency within schools across the country has been access to the
technological resources, which limit the scope of their growth to their
physical classroom. Digital learning requires the doors of the internet to be
open to all students at anytime during the learning process. However, all
growth does not occur through the tech; some innovation will take place in the
improvisation that happens daily in the classroom.
School administrators have the authority needed to support
projects and "experiments" within the classroom. The expectation
shouldn't be for teachers be successful in every class that they teach.
Instead, it should be a constant stream
of ingenuity and creativity coming out of a classroom, with teachers growing
and learning from each lesson as much as students. As any teacher will tell
you, the growth of students is uneven
and not every assignment has a successful conclusion. Administrators must note
this concept, that in the course of inventing new and exciting ways of teaching
will not always lead to successful results. However, it is important for
"edventors" to track their progress so that they can grow from
failures and build upon successes until the project is final. For administrators,
it is important to allow teachers to fail so that they can grow even stronger
in the classroom.
If teachers take this new mindset of innovation into the
classroom, I believe some exciting things will begin to take place. Teachers
will want to stay in the classroom. The feeling of some level of autonomy
and freedom will make the profession more appealing. Teachers will create
some new ways of building student success. Students will be the true
winners of this movement when new ideas are spread across states into new
classrooms. Teachers will become more invested in their own classroom and
effectiveness. Results and assessment will find a renewed meaning for
teachers who invent. Just like a chef wants to taste his new recipe, a teacher
will want to know if the strategies and inventions in the classroom are
effective through the use of assessment.
For educators, the time is now. Invention will key the
change of education. Creating an environment of innovation will only benefit
the students of tomorrow.
I like your idea that standards can act as a boundary or safety net for teachers who want to be creative, instead of holding them back. I had had never thought of it in quite that way before!
ReplyDeleteReading this brings to mind Kentucky's Districts of Innovation program. With proper oversight can teachers be given even more leeway to improve instruction by allowing more lenient interpretations of these standards?
ReplyDelete